Sometimes my co-host, Paul, is in a chatty mood with his own stories to tell, and sometimes he's inquisitive, playing the role of interviewer. Last night saw an abundance of the latter as Paul really got me to open up about all sorts of things. From the innocent topic of matched vs. traditional grip to the far more personal topic of discussing when I've had my own confidence as a player shaken (and when I've shaken another player's confidence), this episode was uniquely revealing. I'm happy it's out there, but I never would have chosen these topics from a list!
This week's MGG is up. John F. Braun and I had a good show today, with lots of interaction from the chat room that really enhanced the show, at least from my perspective. I'm always happy when folks can provide that real-time feedback to correct a tech issue or add a detail, but today's interactions went beyond that, asking questions behind the questions and really digging in to the thought behind each topic we covered. Hopefully you'll agree it turned out to have a positive impact on the show. Thanks to everyone who participated!
I've heard a lot of comments lately saying something along the lines of, "Coin, Plastc and Wocket are too late! Apple Pay is the way of the future!" To anyone who shares this sentiment I ask a simple question: Where do you shop?
I have yet to be able to buy gasoline with Apple Pay nor have I been able to use it in a restaurant. Heck, even where it's accepted I've been denied its use by one cashier where another happily took it.
I love Apple Pay. It's super-convenient, secure and, yes, even fun. But it's not ubiquitous. And until it is, there will continue to be a need to carry traditional credit cards ... or some other device of a similar form factor.
I think Coin, Plastc, Wocket and their ilk have at least a good 5 years before we consumers will be ready to drop the wallet altogether. Probably longer.
Today John and I celebrated our tenth anniversary of publishing Mac Geek Gab. The show has both changed quite a bit over the years and also stayed true to the goal of having fun while helping and informing our listeners.
We've had so many wins over the past decade I couldn't possibly begin to count them all (and I'd easily miss some), so it's best to just share how proud I am of what we've accomplished together and I look forward to more.
Thanks to all of our listeners, sponsors, partners and really to anyone who's been involved in the show in any way. It's a fun ride we're on, and I look forward to seeing where it continues to go!
Joe Rogan arguing why everyone should float in an isolation tank:
If the tank was something where it was a machine an you would have to strap yourself in and you had to take a course where you would learn how to get to the center of yur consciousness where your body and your mind didn't exist, it would be like a ride at Disneyland and the line would be 7 hours long. But because it's such a weird, organic method of doing it, people start coming up with reasons not to do it.
This morning I gave the keynote speech at the Podcast New England conference. It also happens that today is exactly the 10th anniversary of us recording the very first Mac Geek Gab episode (listen if you must to that first show, but consider yourself warned: it was our first!). Thus, "10 Lessons from 10 years of Podcasting" seemed a fitting topic.
I had hoped to be able to share audio or video from my keynote, but there was a power outage in downtown Boston this morning that forced a quick relocation to a different (unmic'ed) space, so this one only lives on in the memory of the attendees. I promise to revisit some of these topics in a podcast (perhaps a new podcast) soon. For now, here's the list:
- Listen to Your Own Show
- Schedules Matter
- Know Your Role(s)
- Communicate With Your Co-hosts & Guests
- Sound Quality Matters
- Refine Your Advertising Reads
- Master Your Own Domain (don't be Kramer!)
- Shout From the Rooftops
- Love The Haters
- Don't Get Caught
And most importantly, Thank Your Audience. Thanks for reading, and thanks for being part of my audience over the last ten years (and longer, if you've been reading my stuff, too!).
Curious how many of you can reliably hear any difference here?
It's interesting taking listening tests using tracks with which I'm not intimately familiar, even testing with an Audioengine D1 DAC and either great speakers or great headphones. Using this same setup I certainly occasionally notice a difference between 128kbps MP3 and lossless audio when listening at my desk, but quite a bit less so when I don't know the track, it seems.
Two things come to mind:
- Production values matter. Crap in = Crap out.
- Why in the hell didn't they use the Gold Standard when it comes to A/B audio testing?
Interestingly, after listening to these tests I put on some (lossless) Steely Dan in iTunes and things sounded much wider. While that may still speak to production values, I'm also now suspect of the path audio takes from that particular website through my web browser (Safari) to my speakers.
(hat tip to Dave Mark at The Loop for the link).
I had to admonish a youth hockey referee today (I took his picture since he wouldn't give me his name). It's rare that this happens, but it happens probably once per year. It could be stopped, but USA Hockey is clearly not interested in solving this problem they have.
Youth hockey referees are out there to help keep our kids safe and help kids properly learn the game. In that order. That's it. No personal agendas, no goals of making the game more like the NHL. Not even a goal of "keep it balanced even if that means ignoring some infractions."
None of that. Safety and education are the priorities. That's it.
Today's recipient of the Hamilton Treatment was a referee who has violated his responsibilities in front of me once earlier this year, letting kids fight without stopping it, later watching while a child used his skate to kick another child who was down on the ice. I said nothing to the referee (but I did document it and report it to the rink scheduler).
Today that same referee was intentionally ignoring head contact. The coach on the opposing team asked/argued with him about this and the referee said to him that head contact was not something he was worried about. Unbelievable.
Later in the game my own kid got shoved down in such a way that he hurt his head. The ref put both kids in the penalty box (I'm fine with a ref putting two kids in to calm a game down. That's smart). But when they got to the box the referee actually yelled at my son for getting hurt when my son asked him why he, too, was being put in the box. I was right there doing the score and corrected the referee that he shouldn't be ignoring when a kid tells him he has a head injury. He started to tell me I wasn't a coach and had no right to talk to him. I explained how my position as a parent trumps all. No one disagreed.
This referee should be relieved of his position. Frankly, he should be wise enough to realize it's time for him to quit. Apathy towards children's safety is a bad quality in a youth hockey referee.
But no one watches these referees. No one is there to see when there's a problem developing. And it seems like no one cares even when an issue like this is reported. Which it was. Earlier this year. If my son has a concussion I will probably sue this guy for medical expenses just to make a point. I've had it. The first question to ask the referee: did you check every player's helmet to ensure the stickers are all up to date? I can guarantee you he did not.
Until there is some regular referee oversight by USA Hockey we must continually pressure the referees to pay attention to our children's safety. Many of these guys forget that they are teachers out there, and if USA Hockey isn't going to put a system in place to point out when they miss that, it's up to us parents to do it. This sucks, too, because it creates an adversarial relationship where one should not exist, but it must be done.
I found out today that the sheet-music-oriented community site, PianoFiles, announced that they will shut down in December.
I'm new to PianoFiles, having only joined earlier this year, but it's been a huge resource for me already. As some of you may remember I got back into playing (drums, mostly) in musical theater pits this year, and PianoFiles was the resource that made it super simple for me to use my iPad in the pit instead of sheet music.
Using my iPad means I can make as many notes as I want, back them all up, don't need a light on stage, and can turn pages far more easily than I can with a paper book. It made a huge difference for me.
As I said, I got back into playing in theater pits. It had been almost twenty years since I had done this, and here's how it used to work for all of us musicians:
- Get hired for show.
- Get book (sheet music) from the musical director.
- Go to copy shop and make a copy of sheet music.
- Go to rehearsals and mark up my copy with all the notes that are necessary for that particular production.
- Play the run of shows.
- Return pristine original book back to musical director (who then returns it to publishing company).
- Keep the copy. Sometimes it's fun to go back and revisit those parts. I've learned a lot doing that and it keeps my reading skills fresh.
Step 6 is mandatory. Regardless of how you organize yourself, that book is rented and needs to be returned in as mint condition as possible lest you get fined. If you make notes in it, you damned well better do them in pencil (or stuck-on post-it notes) that you can erase or remove. Someone else is going to use that book next week for a completely different production and wants to start with a clean book just like you did.
When I got hired for a show earlier this year, I got the book and went to Staples. I figured I'd either follow my exact method above (and use the paper copy during shows as I used to) or I would have them scan it into a PDF that I could use on my iPad, depending upon the cost. At that point I wasn't sure if my iPad would work for me (it does!).
What did Staples tell me? "We're sorry. This book is copyrighted. You need a release letter from the publisher in order for us to copy it." THAT never happened 20 years ago!
I had two options. Ok, well, three, but actually getting a bona-fide release letter (and doing so in time) was probably a long-shot. I could phony up a release letter (how would the rep at Staples know?) or I could find someone who already had the PDF and just use that. I suppose I could also scan it myself, though doing that with a 100+ page spiral bound book would be a disaster.
I went to the Googles while standing there in Staples and found PianoFiles. This site just allows folks like me to list what scores we have and what we want. The site doesn't host any files, and trades are arranged person-to-person. There's no mass distribution of files. I'm not sure, but it's possible what we're doing (sharing scores with each other) might even fall as legal under copyright law (similar to if I shared a copy of the new Phish album with you). Either way, the folks I've met through PianoFiles are all quite pleasant and aren't interested in screwing anyone. They're all mostly musicians just looking to make things easier for shows to which they already have the rights.
But no. ICMP organized a terrible letter-writing campaign to get this great resource shut down. Terrible. Just another example of an old business model hanging on and not changing with the times. We musicians don't get paid very much, either. But we want to be able to play the shows we're paid to do. Either distribute PDFs or let us share them when you give us paper books.
It's not like anyone is going to get the PDFs of a show via someone they met at PianoFiles and then actually, you know, rent out a theater and put the show on without getting the rights. There's far more at risk there than would make it worth that, and the rights to shows (which come with the book rentals) are priced quite fairly from what I've seen. If you know what you're doing you can likely make your money back and then some, even in a small theater (because rights are priced based on number of seats capable of being sold).
ICMP should stop hanging on by a thread and instead start a letter-writing campaign pleading with their own publishers to provide PDF copies when someone licenses the rights to a show. Why that's not already happening is something that I find quite curious.
Hopefully this injustice can be reversed. Otherwise I think I have a new idea for a site to launch.
I wrote this to a friend today and figured it best to share with you all. Yes, I'm quoting myself. Live with it. Love it.
The best and worst thing Google has ever done is give people reports showing data that people think they want to see. In reality that data does nothing more than cement peoples reliance and addiction upon that data from Google, regardless of how flawed, inaccurate or misleading it is.
The wait for Swatch's new SISTEM51 here in the US is (almost) over!
The SISTEM51 is Swatch's fully-automatic, all-mechanical US$150 watch and on Tuesday (yes, this coming Tuesday!), July 1st, 2014, the SISTEM51 will make it's official USA debut at Swatch's Flagship Store in Times Square located at 1528 Broadway, New York City.
One week later on July 8th, a pop-up shop dedicated entirely to the SISTEM51 will launch in San Francisco, California at 101 Grant Street on the corner of Geary Avenue.
When asked about availability outside of those two stores, Swatch's Michael Zucconi says, "It will open to the rest of Swatch stores nationwide...I expect that to happen at the end of summer!"
Perhaps your watch-loving summer plans will take you to New York or San Francisco but, if not, the end of the summer will see these on more USA wrists. I'm looking forward to checking it out, for sure!
Life's always hectic for me. It's my natural state, I suppose. This month is a bit more hectic than normal, if there is such a thing. In addition to all my regular activities, I've just finished tech week and 3 shows of Next to Normal, my first foray into playing in a theater pit in over ten years. We have 8 more shows to go over the next two weekends, and then 18 hours after we finish the last show I'll get on a plane to head to San Francisco for Macworld/iWorld Expo.
And I have some planning to do for that last bit in the interim.
So yes, life is crazy. A few weeks ago, though, a conversation with my mom prompted a discussion with my wife about how an experience in a floatation tank was a bucket list item for me. A few days later my wife had not only found a place locally (Float Maine in Portland, Maine), she gave me a gift certificate good for two floats.
I had my first float this afternoon and it was nothing like I expected, and everything I wanted.
I've always casually referred to floatation tanks as "sensory deprivation tanks" but that's really a misnomer. One's senses are fully engaged, you just have very little (or no) external stimuli. I chose to leave the light off and the door closed, so eyes open or closed made no difference — it was all pitch black... until it wasn't.
Upon entry into the tank it took me a few minutes to get situated. The water was all churned up from my entrance, and that meant once I started floating I was bouncing around a little bit against the walls. No big deal, but the experience really couldn't start until the bouncing stopped. Focusing on that, though, distracted me from just waiting and... I honestly don't even remember the bouncing stopping... during my hour in the tank I never slept (at least I don't think I did), but I certainly wasn't alert in the normal sense.
Things got intense very quickly for me, and I lost the sense that I was on my back. Gravity really wasn't an issue, other than occasionally noticing it pulling on the skin on my face. For most of it I felt as if I were standing — or at least upright — but in a very relaxed way with no pressure anywhere. I saw visions in front of me, and even interacted with faces and people that I envisioned.
It wasn't uncomfortable in any way — almost like a dream, it seemed absolutely normal to see these people and other visions, and was in no way jarring or scary. After all, it was just my head creating all of this.
Somewhere around what I would consider the halfway mark I got distracted by my own thoughts and focused on the tank itself for a while. Again, I couldn't see, feel, or hear anything — but I spent some time acutely aware of my state in the tank.
And then I started hearing music — my own music in my head. A lot of the tunes I'd been playing in the pit for the last week ran through my head (we did 6 straight days of running the show between tech week and opening weekend). I enjoyed watching the music go by, dissecting it without really worrying about it — just hearing it deconstruct and enjoyed going deeper and deeper with it.
After that passed I again became aware of my surroundings... then I drifted into a clear-mind, meditative state for a while, after which I started hearing music. This time it was unfamiliar music and I realized that was my signal that my hour in the tank was up.
I got up, dripped dry, then showered and headed home.
But not before booking my next appointment in the tank. I'm quite looking forward to my next experience in there.
During the last week of July 2013, Lisa noticed an article in Bottom Line Personal entitled, "I'm Kicking the Sugar Habit!" We receive BLP in print form every two weeks, but most of the articles make it online, this among them.
The article laid out a really simple, four-week plan that basically is geared to help folks build new eating habits that limit sugar intake. I'm always game for challenging and/or breaking habits, so when Lisa suggested we try this, I was right on board. I don't eat much sugar, so I figured it would be a pretty mild experience.
The plan starts out with a three-day sugar fast where we ate nothing that included any sugars whatsoever. That meant no starches, no fruit, no dairy ... and obviously no cookies before bed!
During those three days I ate plenty of food, but at the end of day two I was experiencing hunger pangs, headaches, and general physical resistance to this new concept. Much to my surprise I was addicted to sugar.
More than that, I had developed a very incorrect meter of what it felt like to truly be "full." Eating breads and other processed starches really twists your perception of hunger. There's a reason they call that stuff "comfort food," and like most folks I had easily fallen into that trap.
But I pushed through that and after three days I was on a good road. I followed the articles plan for another few weeks, slowly re-introducing foods (starting with red wine and cheese!), and continuing through to whole grains and all of that.
In that first three week period I lost about 8 pounds. Weight loss was not my goal with this (I've never been fat or even close to it) but I realized I was carrying some extra weight, so this was a nice thing to see. A good bit of that weight was likely water weight (carbohydrates cause us to store a ton of water), but some of it was truly weight loss.
By about week number four I had come up with a new eating routine for myself and abandoned the article's strict schedule. My goal was to challenge and re-evaluate my eating habits, and I had accomplished that.
Since August 1, 2013 I've lost an average of one pound per week, and I'm down almost 25 pounds since then. I don't really need to lose much more, so I may have to increase my intake of something at some point soon, or maybe my body will level out.
I basically still eat what I want, and if that means I want bread I eat it. But I do so with the knowledge that eating bread or grains or carbs at every meal is not something I need, nor is it good for me. So now instead of a sandwich for lunch I'll often have a salad if that's convenient (but I sometimes still have sandwiches). At night instead of having cookies I'll have a piece of dark chocolate and maybe some cheddar cheese (but sometimes I still have cookies!).
Breakfast is where the biggest and easiest change came for me. Instead of a quick bowl of cereal I now have an apple and a few slices of cheddar (and I still drink orange juice). Not only does that keep me from starting the day with processed carbs, but it also leaves me feeling full a LOT longer.
Oh... and I snack on nuts now. LOTS of nuts.
If you're looking for something to do in the new year, I highly recommend taking a look at this simple plan.
I've been interested in Swatch's new, mechanical, automatic and inexpensive Sistem51 since it was announced earlier this year.
This week the Sistem51 (finally!) went on sale... in Switzerland. The US release is still planned for "early 2014," though they won't confirm a more specific time frame than that (at least not with me... and not yet).
But the exciting thing they did share with me this morning is ... it comes in more than just blue! Black, Red and White (with a multi-color skeleton back) are now all in the line-up.
For now... the pics. More when I know more.
As recent readers to my blog know I've been going through the process of collecting information to make a decision about my family's health insurance needs for the future. I've made that decision, enacted it, and now am free-and-clear to resume living my life until this time next year when I'll need to decide what to do for 2015.Read More
Ok, so on the surface this is good for me. It lets me keep my plan. (Edit: no, it won't. New Hampshire has opted not to extend the cancelation deadline, likely for the reasons I originally detailed below).
But... we're also still mandating that insurance companies must take people with pre-existing conditions. And now we're (effectively) saying that – in those states where the no-longer-canceled policies were cheaper – people who could previously get insurance are not going to be mandated into ObamaCare.
So the math then tells me that, in those aforementioned states (like New Hampshire, but not New York*), the ObamaCare plans will only be used by those who previously couldn't get insurance, effectively making those plans high-risk plans, and raising those premiums up to the roof (just like they were for pre-ObamaCare high risk plans).
If correct, then what's the point? If we're going to do this, we can't split the baby and expect it to still be "affordable" for everyone. At least not according to my math. Am I wrong?
*The data I've seen shows that some states (New Hampshire, Florida, Texas) will see massive increases for previously-insured folks on individual plans while other states (like New York, where it was previously highly-regulated) will likely see rates drop with ObamaCare plans.
Earlier this year Swatch made waves in the watch industry when they introduced the Sistem51, a watch with a mechanical movement whose assembly is fully-automated. This keeps costs down (think $150) while presumably preserving high quality (they say the watch is regulated by a laser at the factory and requires no further tuning).
Initially rumored for USA arrival in October, today Michael Zucconi, PR Manager for the Swatch Group USA confirmed to me that we won't see the watch here until 2014. According to Michael:
"The first four models will be available in Switzerland at selected stores on December 15, 2013. Due to the high demand, the worldwide launch is set for early 2014 and there is much more to explore... More information will be available on the US launch closer to the launch in Switzerland. Please keep an eye out for the announcement."
So... we wait. Longer.
On Wednesday, President Obama sat down with NBC and issued what amounts to a blanket apology to people like me who had very good health insurance plans which will be canceled as a part of ACA/ObamaCare next year (plans that he has called "substandard"). Apology accepted. And Obama also deserves a heartfelt attaboy for stepping up and admitting that this thing isn't perfect and that it's gonna hurt some folks. This is a good start.
He also goes on to say, effectively, that he and his staff working as hard and fast as they can to fix this. That's great to hear, too, though I'd be very curious to learn more about what he means by that.
As I best understand it, plans like mine have to go away so that my family can be put into a group with a variety of people, including those previously uninsurable. If they don't bring me, a "low risk" person (and family) into that plan then how do they expect to lower the premiums for the previously "high risk" people?
After all it's just math, not magic.
Still, I'll be following with a watchful eye and an open mind. I have nothing to lose — I'll find my best path through the new system as I always have, and right now that means starting sometime next year my premiums will nearly double. We'll see how that comes to pass. The next six weeks will be very interesting.
After last week's Apple Event in San Francisco I had a chance to chat with Bloomberg's Jon Erlichman on Pimm Fox's show. It was a fun chat, despite the treachery of the cars racing by just inches behind us! The thing that most impressed me at the event was the iPad Air. We got to handle them a bit in the hands-on room after the presentation, and that device really does earn its "Air" moniker. Amazingly light, and really easy to hold in one hand. That plus free OS X Mavericks made for a good showing. In any event, the segment I did is below.
I don't hate Barack Obama. I wish the man no ill will and, honestly, I originally liked ObamaCare's high-level concepts.
Ensuring that everyone gets some basic level of healthcare is A-OK by me, and I have gone on record stating that I am OK paying a little more to ensure that happens. I also like the idea of simply changing something about the system so that we'd break out of the status quo. In addition to those talking points, though, I also liked the idea that I could keep my health insurance plan if it suited me. As I posted yesterday, that seems not to be the case, but that's yesterday's news.
Today, though, I read something that really bothered me more than any of the rest of this. Today I read that Mr. Obama called the health insurance plan I have "substandard." That took all manner of politics out of it and hit home in a very very personal way for me.
I am not a perfect man. I am not a perfect husband (despite repeated assertions by my wife to the contrary!), and I am not a perfect father (for the record, my kids make no assertions to the contrary). But I do try really hard, and I care so very much, and I realized today that calling anything I do for my kids and family "substandard" hits a nerve.
Yesterday, Mr. Obama called the type of health insurance plan that has served my family for 10+ years "substandard." This type of plan has served us through the birth of a child, several sets of broken bones, major invasive surgery and related hospitalization, a concussion, Lyme disease, Bell's Palsy, and all manner of everyday maladies that happen to a growing family.
Every year I take the previous three years' numbers and run them against all kinds of insurance plans. I, too, like the "pie in the sky" idea of a no-fuss, $30-copay, and every year I hope that my math will show me that in at least one of the previous three years that would have been the smart plan to get. But every single time I do the math it shows me that the only correct move for us is the one I have always chosen: a high-deductible plan that does nothing more than protect us from bankruptcy. True insurance.
With this type of plan we pay for our healthcare starting with dollar one, and the plan essentially only kicks in when we've spent more than about $5,000 on any one person in the family. Yes, that means our cash flow is sometimes unpredictably impacted, but it saves us thousands every year.
It's never made any sense whatsoever for us to carry maternity coverage, either. Even in the year our son was born it made more financial sense to pay out-of-pocket for the pregnancy-related costs than it would have to add maternity to our plan. It's important to note that while our plan didn't cover routine maternity costs (by our choice, of course), it would have (and did) cover any pregnancy-related complications. Again, our insurance was chosen by us to minimize our yearly out-of-pocket costs (and protect us from bankruptcy, of course), nothing more.
Every year I put a lot of responsible thought and effort into choosing exactly the right health insurance plan for my family, and for our President — someone to whom we're supposed to look up and respect — to call it "substandard" says to me that he thinks I'm a substandard father for actively and repeatedly choosing this path for my family.
Screw you, buddy. To call any human "substandard" is not something I'll tolerate from anyone. Not from my kids, not from my coworkers, and certainly not from you.