<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passionate Podcasters Protect PodCamp (but miss my point)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/</link>
	<description>...because that's who I am.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kownacki</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/comment-page-1/#comment-8755</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kownacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/#comment-8755</guid>
		<description>As one of the organizers of the Pittsburgh PodCamp, I understand both sides of this argument. I can see where weekends have the &quot;hobby&quot; mentality associated with them, while weekdays have the &quot;business&quot; mentality.

I guess the question of when to hold a PodCamp depends upon one&#039;s primary reason for holding the PodCamp in the first place: is it intended to be a business-oriented POV or a socially-oriented POV?

In order to get people to take off from work and attend a PodCamp during the week, you&#039;d need to be able to provide them with something tangibly beneficial, which they can take back to their day jobs and say, &quot;This was worth the time spent NOT at my desk today.&quot;

Since PodCamp, by and large, is an open-source conversation, and very a much a &quot;you get out of it what you put into&quot; philosophy, I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s designed to justify time lost from from one&#039;s paying job. I almost think that, in order to become that type of conference, we&#039;d need to drop the &quot;un&quot; and put up formalities that would affect the way in which the experience is perceived: less about an open dialogue and more about the business and infrastructure.

Perhaps that&#039;s what a weekday PodCamp WOULD need to be, but I think the current model is built around unrushed, unforced and open-ended dialogues, which may lend itself better to a weekend than to the goal-oriented and product-driven 9-5 workweek.

Perhaps we&#039;re considering two different potential conferences here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the organizers of the Pittsburgh PodCamp, I understand both sides of this argument. I can see where weekends have the &#8220;hobby&#8221; mentality associated with them, while weekdays have the &#8220;business&#8221; mentality.</p>
<p>I guess the question of when to hold a PodCamp depends upon one&#8217;s primary reason for holding the PodCamp in the first place: is it intended to be a business-oriented POV or a socially-oriented POV?</p>
<p>In order to get people to take off from work and attend a PodCamp during the week, you&#8217;d need to be able to provide them with something tangibly beneficial, which they can take back to their day jobs and say, &#8220;This was worth the time spent NOT at my desk today.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since PodCamp, by and large, is an open-source conversation, and very a much a &#8220;you get out of it what you put into&#8221; philosophy, I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s designed to justify time lost from from one&#8217;s paying job. I almost think that, in order to become that type of conference, we&#8217;d need to drop the &#8220;un&#8221; and put up formalities that would affect the way in which the experience is perceived: less about an open dialogue and more about the business and infrastructure.</p>
<p>Perhaps that&#8217;s what a weekday PodCamp WOULD need to be, but I think the current model is built around unrushed, unforced and open-ended dialogues, which may lend itself better to a weekend than to the goal-oriented and product-driven 9-5 workweek.</p>
<p>Perhaps we&#8217;re considering two different potential conferences here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave LaMorte, Teaching for the Future Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/comment-page-1/#comment-8754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave LaMorte, Teaching for the Future Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/podcasting/2007/02/21/passionate-podcasters-protect-podcamp-but-miss-my-point/#comment-8754</guid>
		<description>No I totally understand what you&#039;re saying, I just think that most people who go to these conferences aren&#039;t in your situation.  I bet there are a bunch of folks who would love to have a PodCamp during the week.  You could organize one.  

If you need help I&#039;d talk to Chris Penn and Chris Brogan and they could point you in the right direction.  I&#039;d love to help you out, but don&#039;t tell me that I don&#039;t understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I totally understand what you&#8217;re saying, I just think that most people who go to these conferences aren&#8217;t in your situation.  I bet there are a bunch of folks who would love to have a PodCamp during the week.  You could organize one.  </p>
<p>If you need help I&#8217;d talk to Chris Penn and Chris Brogan and they could point you in the right direction.  I&#8217;d love to help you out, but don&#8217;t tell me that I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
