<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MacBook Pro saga continues&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/</link>
	<description>...because that's who I am.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>How about a Geek Gab Special as soon as the Macbook arrives. I&#039;m dying to know how fast Rosetta-using apps run in comparison to my trusty PowerBook G4 15&quot; 1,5 GHz. Especially the performance of Photoshop Elements would be very interesting along with M$ Office. 

@lern: Don&#039;t they also say &quot;the police are here&quot; in the US? I am not a native speaker, though, and have never been to the US ... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Geek Gab Special as soon as the Macbook arrives. I&#8217;m dying to know how fast Rosetta-using apps run in comparison to my trusty PowerBook G4 15&#8243; 1,5 GHz. Especially the performance of Photoshop Elements would be very interesting along with M$ Office. </p>
<p>@lern: Don&#8217;t they also say &#8220;the police are here&#8221; in the US? I am not a native speaker, though, and have never been to the US &#8230; <img src='http://www.davethenerd.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qrt</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Qrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>People in the UK (and probably other parts of the Commonwealth) refer to corporate (but singular) entities like companies and, indeed, the BBC, in plural form (i.e. &quot;the BBC are broadcasting the Olympics on BBC2&quot;). One wonders what else the Brits have done to mess up the English language...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People in the UK (and probably other parts of the Commonwealth) refer to corporate (but singular) entities like companies and, indeed, the BBC, in plural form (i.e. &#8220;the BBC are broadcasting the Olympics on BBC2&#8243;). One wonders what else the Brits have done to mess up the English language&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lern Nglise</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Lern Nglise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with all the &quot;Apple as a plural&quot; references? It seems like every english class no-show that leaves a comment on any Mac related website makes this mistake. &quot;Apple are having&quot; ---- Sheesh! IT&#039;S &quot;APPLE IS HAVING&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with all the &#8220;Apple as a plural&#8221; references? It seems like every english class no-show that leaves a comment on any Mac related website makes this mistake. &#8220;Apple are having&#8221; &#8212;- Sheesh! IT&#8217;S &#8220;APPLE IS HAVING&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hoult</title>
		<link>http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hoult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davethenerd.com/davehamilton/mac-stuff/2006/02/19/the-macbook-pro-saga-continues/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>It would seem that Apple are having all kinds of issues with their (reportedly) ancient web based ordering infrastructure. These kinds of edits from both ends (due to the free CPU upgrade) and the sheer volume of back orders (ie. databases not being able to check them off as en route) are not what the original back end was designed for and aparently it hasn&#039;t been upgraded in years... Perhaps it&#039;s time for an upgrade themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that Apple are having all kinds of issues with their (reportedly) ancient web based ordering infrastructure. These kinds of edits from both ends (due to the free CPU upgrade) and the sheer volume of back orders (ie. databases not being able to check them off as en route) are not what the original back end was designed for and aparently it hasn&#8217;t been upgraded in years&#8230; Perhaps it&#8217;s time for an upgrade themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
